AI security log analysis
Upload or paste events, identify suspicious patterns, score risk, and connect findings to relevant MITRE ATT&CK techniques.
Analyze approved security logs and evidence, search trusted RAG knowledge, investigate indicators, prioritize CVEs, guide incident response, and prepare analyst-reviewed reports in one focused workspace.
Read the complete product and user guideShowing security dashboard, slide 1 of 5.
SecureViewIQ supports analyst-led security research and incident investigation with AI security log analysis, RAG knowledge search, threat intelligence, vulnerability prioritization, response guidance, and reporting in one focused workflow.
Upload or paste events, identify suspicious patterns, score risk, and connect findings to relevant MITRE ATT&CK techniques.
Validate and enrich IPs, domains, file hashes, and CVEs while preserving investigation history and analyst context.
Rank CVEs with NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, asset exposure, and remediation context so analysts know what to fix first.
Ask questions across approved security documents and keep answers grounded in the sources available to your team.
Organize evidence, verify findings, plan justified response actions, and track incidents from initial signal through closure.
Continue source-aware investigations with an AI assistant designed to support analyst judgment—not replace it.
Turn investigation notes and verified findings into clean, analyst-ready reports for stakeholders.
Keep each conclusion connected to the evidence and analyst decisions behind it.
Paste logs, upload supported files, or describe an alert or security incident.
Review risk signals, indicators, knowledge sources, and mapped techniques in one place.
Separate observed facts from assumptions before choosing a response.
Document justified next steps, validate closure, and prepare a clear report.
Open the complete SecureViewIQ system guide for step-by-step instructions, supported inputs, review checkpoints, troubleshooting, and current product boundaries.
Open full documentationChoose the correct purpose, upload supported evidence, run Log Analysis, and continue a completed analysis into Enrich & Review.
View evidence guideUse Chat Assistant and Ready knowledge documents, then review source context, assumptions, confidence, and evidence gaps.
View grounded-analysis guideEnrich indicators, review provider freshness and internal sightings, and prioritize CVEs using exploit and asset context.
View intelligence guidesFollow the five-step incident workflow, document the outcome, produce reviewed reports, and observe human approval boundaries.
View response guideBlocking, isolation, account disablement, remediation, and closure decisions remain under human control.
Reduce time spent moving between logs, threat lookups, internal documents, incident notes, and reporting tools.
Maintain a consistent evidence-first workflow while preparing clear investigation output for multiple customers.
Give small security teams a structured way to investigate alerts, organize context, and document decisions.
There is no single best cybersecurity tool for every job. Compare each product against the workflow, evidence, integrations, human controls, and outcomes your team actually needs.
Look for reliable evidence intake, source-aware analysis, clear product boundaries, analyst review, investigation history, and reporting that makes each conclusion traceable.
Yes. It uses AI to assist log analysis, grounded knowledge search, threat investigation, vulnerability prioritization, incident-response guidance, and reporting while keeping material decisions under human control.
Yes, for authorized defensive research. Analysts can examine uploaded evidence, enrich indicators and CVEs, consult approved knowledge, preserve context, and document defensible findings.
Yes. Analysts can paste events or upload supported evidence, identify suspicious patterns, score risk, and review relevant MITRE ATT&CK context before accepting a finding.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation searches approved Ready documents and grounds answers in the sources available to the selected knowledge scope.
Analysts can enrich IP addresses, domains, URLs, hashes, and CVEs, then review provider evidence, freshness, internal sightings, and investigation history.
It combines available NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, asset-exposure, and remediation context so analysts can decide which vulnerabilities need attention first.
Yes. Teams can organize evidence, verify findings, document response decisions, track the incident workflow, and produce an analyst-reviewed report.
No. It does not automatically collect network telemetry, discover installed software, run exploits, apply patches, or make production changes without authorized human action.
SecureViewIQ is built around authenticated access, role-aware administration, auditability, defensive-use boundaries, and human review for high-impact actions.
Application routes and account access are protected through Spring Security.
User and Analyst roles use the investigation workspace; the Admin role alone can access protected administration controls.
Security and administrative events can be reviewed from the protected workspace.
Blocking, isolation, account disablement, and production changes remain analyst decisions.